Catherine Polli studied law at Newcastle University, graduating in 1996. She then went on to complete the Bar of vocational course at the Inns of Court School of Law in London, qualifying in 1997.

Having  undertaken two specialist family pupillages in London she subsequently became a tenant at Tanfield Chambers. Whilst a pupil she was awarded a Hardwick Scholarship from Lincoln’s Inn.  Having practiced as a family specialist at the Bar in London for 7 years she decided to enter into private practice in Essex in 2003. She then joined Pinney Talfourd in 2004 as Head of the family team, becoming a Partner at Pinney Talfourd in 2006.

Catherine has remained head of the family team since that time. Over that time the family team has grown significantly both in strength and size and in now ranked in Tier 1 of Legal 500. She is also  named as a Leading Individual. Catherine continues to supervise all lawyers in the team. Catherine also now manages the marketing and business development team and is involved in the day to day management of the firm in her role Client Services Partner.  She also deputises for the Managing Partner when on leave.

She continues to undertakes divorce and financial remedy work with almost all of her clients being referred to her either by previous clients or professional contacts.

On a personal note

In her spare time Catherine likes to spend time with her husband Tim who practises at the Bar in Central London, and their two children.

They have been fortunate enough in recent years to travel frequently to countries including the US, Singapore, Thailand and Australia.

Catherine also enjoys Pilates reformer exercise which is a new found hobby and passion.

In her spare time she is also a governor of a central London school, a role she is passionate about. In that role she sits on the finances committee and safeguarding committee as well as on the main Board.

Noteable achievements

  • Representing a client in financial remedy negotiations with assets in excess of £20m, incorporating commercial and residential property, company shares, other assets and tax issues.
  • Advising in relation to potential enforcement proceedings following a financial remedy Consent Order where the assets exceeded £15m.
  • Advising in relation to a £4m financial remedy involving income differential and school fees.
  • Advising in relation to financial remedy relating to older parties who were married previously and therefore held pre-acquired assets. Assets exceeded £7m.
  • Representing a City client with assets in excess of £16m property, company shares and significant other investments.
  • Representing a High Net Worth Client with assets in excess of £7m in negotiations with a City Firm. Assets included London property, a country property, property and investments abroad and pensions. After a financial remedy Consent Order was sealed the parties reconciled and a post nuptial agreement is now being considered.
  • Representing the applicant wife on an application for a financial remedy. The wife was a high earner and supported the husband during the marriage. She also made other significant financial contributions unmatched by the husband. The parties had no children together and the issues surrounded the categorisation of matrimonial/non-matrimonial property, inheritance, a significant number of chattels and whether the pension accrual prior to the marriage should be ringfenced.
  • Representing a client with assets in excess of £50m with issues involving non-matrimonial assets.
  • Advising the applicant husband in a very contentious financial remedy case. The husband worked for a well-known investment bank and had a complex income structure, which included restricted stock units as part of his bonus scheme. There were also a number of properties, some which were purchased by the husband or inherited by him. The wife had not worked during the marriage, and the parties had four children. The focus is therefore how the wife will meet her housing needs, the term and quantum of spousal maintenance and child maintenance (with the child maintenance being calculated using the James V Seymour calculation) and her income on retirement.

Qualifications & memberships

  • Legal500 logo
  • Legal500 logo
  • Chambers & Partners 2026